# Artichoke leaf extract and cynarin: bile, enzymes, and lipids

- Canonical: https://nutrifit.health/knowledge/artichoke-extract-cynarin-choleretic-lipid-metabolism
- Language: en
- Published: 2026-10-08T15:14:36.614Z
- Updated: 2026-10-08T15:14:36.614Z
- Author: NutriFit Editorial

> Cynarin, luteolin, and cynaropicrin chemistry; choleresis and cholekinesis, bile transporters, CYP51A1/HMGCR, and clinical findings. Separating physiology, cellular experiments, and human evidence.

Artichoke leaf extract is a mixture investigated for dyspepsia and lipid disturbances. Cynarin is a useful chemical marker, but does not explain every effect of the mixture. Assessment requires separating chemical reactions, the body's physiological pathways, and outcomes obtained with a particular preparation in people. Claims about direct CYP51A1 inhibition especially need scrutiny: a structure of the human enzyme does not establish an artichoke effect.

## Botany, medicinal leaf, and edible flower head

Cultivated artichoke belongs to *Cynara cardunculus*, family Asteraceae; *Cynara scolymus* remains common in pharmacological publications. Its Mediterranean origin and relationship to cardoon help explain cultivar diversity. Historical use does not establish the efficacy of a modern extract.

The edible receptacle and bract bases of an immature flower head differ from *Cynarae folium*, the medicinal true leaves. The food contains water, fiber, and fructans, including inulin with predominantly β-(2→1) linkages. A portion of vegetable, powdered leaf, and dry extract cannot be compared by mass alone. Extraction changes composition: inulin in the plant does not guarantee a clinically meaningful quantity in a capsule.

The phenylpropanoid pathway through PAL, C4H, and 4CL supports hydroxycinnamic-acid formation; HQT participates in caffeoylquinic derivatives. Terpenoid metabolism supplies sesquiterpene lactones. Cultivar, organ, growth stage, environment, drying, and solvent change the proportions. Fixed cynarin or luteolin percentages cannot be generalized to all plant material.

Flavones and phenolic acids contribute to protection against light and oxidative stress, while bitter lactones contribute to chemical defense. Catechol groups can donate electrons or hydrogen atoms and interact with metals. These chemical features motivate research, but neither bitterness nor an antioxidant assay determines a human dose.

## Three phytochemical groups with different biological fates

### Caffeoylquinic acids

Cynarin is an ester of quinic acid with two caffeic-acid residues: C₂₅H₂₄O₁₂, approximately 516.45 g/mol. The names 1,3- and 1,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid appear under different numbering conventions. Comparisons should verify the actual structure instead of treating the numbers as proof of different active ingredients. Chlorogenic acid, usually 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid under modern numbering, is C₁₆H₁₈O₉, approximately 354.31 g/mol; caffeic acid is C₉H₈O₄, 180.16 g/mol.

Esterification, positional isomerism, and hydrolysis alter solubility and interactions. Catechol fragments can stabilize phenoxyl radicals and bind transition-metal ions. A solution reaction does not establish an effect in a hepatocyte membrane: concentration, environment, and metabolism matter. Cynarin cannot therefore be assumed to inhibit every lipid-metabolism enzyme.

### Luteolin and glycosides

Luteolin is 3′,4′,5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone, C₁₅H₁₀O₆, approximately 286.24 g/mol. Its conjugated flavone scaffold and catechol B ring influence reactivity. Cynaroside is luteolin-7-O-glucoside, C₂₁H₂₀O₁₁, 448.38 g/mol; scolymoside is luteolin-7-O-rutinoside, C₂₇H₃₀O₁₅, 594.52 g/mol. Their glycosidic linkage is not an ordinary ester linkage.

Sugar attachment changes water solubility and cellular uptake; hydrolysis can release the aglycone. Experiments using free luteolin and a glycoside therefore produce different exposures. Enhanced cellular effects after added β-glucosidase do not determine hepatic free-luteolin exposure after a commercial product (Gebhardt, 2002).

### Cynaropicrin and related lactones

Cynaropicrin is a bitter guaianolide, C₁₉H₂₂O₆, approximately 346.37 g/mol, with fused rings and an α-methylene-γ-lactone group. This electrophilic group can undergo Michael addition with thiols; reactivity is relevant to both experimental effects and sensitization. Related compounds include grosheimin and other lactones. Scolymoside belongs to flavonoid glycosides and should not be assigned to this group.

Bitterness is not a measure of clinical gallbladder emptying. Receptor recognition would still require evidence about intestinal exposure, hormone release, and human motility.

## Choleresis and cholekinesis are distinct processes

Choleresis is hepatic bile production and secretion, followed by modification in ducts. Cholekinesis is gallbladder emptying, requiring coordination of wall contraction with resistance along the outlet. Increased duodenal bile alone cannot quantify the contribution of each process.

[![Bile formation by hepatocytes and cholangiocytes and gallbladder emptying: general physiology, not proven artichoke targets.](https://api.nutrifit.health/api/v2/public/knowledge/files/images/nutrifit-scientific-20261002-artichoke-extract-cynarin-choleretic-lipid-metabolism-bile-en-v3.png)](https://api.nutrifit.health/api/v2/public/knowledge/files/images/nutrifit-scientific-20261002-artichoke-extract-cynarin-choleretic-lipid-metabolism-bile-en-v3.png)

### Hepatocyte, canaliculus, and cholangiocyte

Canalicular BSEP/ABCB11 exports bile salts; MDR3/ABCB4 moves phosphatidylcholine toward the outer membrane leaflet; MRP2/ABCC2 exports organic anions including bilirubin conjugates. These transporters have different substrates. Phosphatidylcholine contributes to mixed micelles that reduce the damaging action of free bile acids. Solute secretion also supplies an osmotic component of water movement. This is physiological background, rather than a verified map of artichoke targets (Trauner and Boyer, 2003).

Duct cells contribute bicarbonate and water. AE2/SLC4A2 exchanges Cl⁻ and HCO₃⁻ electroneutrally, depending on gradients and coupled systems. Carbonic anhydrase accelerates reversible CO₂ hydration rather than producing bicarbonate independently of equilibrium:

$$
\mathrm{CO_2+H_2O\rightleftharpoons H_2CO_3\rightleftharpoons H^++HCO_3^-}.
$$

A bicarbonate layer near the apical surface limits entry of certain protonated bile acids. This protective concept does not establish artichoke activation of CA-II, AE2, or aquaporins, guaranteed lower bile viscosity, or gallstone prevention. A fixed universal bile-acid-independent fraction or protective pH also requires model-specific evidence (Medina, 2011).

### FXR and feedback

Bile acids signal through FXR/NR1H4, interacting with RXRα/NR2B1. Hepatic FXR–SHP and intestinal FXR–FGF19 participate in negative feedback on bile-acid synthesis; CYP7A1 catalyzes an early step in the classical pathway. Consequently, FXR activation and CYP7A1 induction should not be combined into one positive causal arrow without direct evidence.

The identification of a bile-acid receptor (Makishima et al., 1999) explains regulation, not selective cynarin action. Simultaneous induction of BSEP, MDR3, MRP2, and preserved CYP7A1 would require measurements of expression, activity, and exposure for the particular extract. Comparing it with a synthetic FXR agonist cannot replace those measurements.

### Intestinal bitterness, CCK, and smooth muscle

TAS2R taste receptors occur beyond the tongue. Bitter stimuli can evoke calcium signaling and cholecystokinin, CCK, release in experimental cells (Chen et al., 2006). This does not establish the sequence cynaropicrin–TAS2R10/14–human I cell–CCK after a usual artichoke dose.

A chemosensory cascade may involve G proteins, PLC, PIP₂ hydrolysis into DAG and IP₃, endoplasmic-reticulum Ca²⁺ release, TRPM5, and voltage-sensitive channels. Receptor isoforms, subunits, and sensitivity require demonstration in the relevant system. Details from the mouse tumor-derived STC-1 line cannot automatically be assigned to human intestinal I cells.

CCK1R participates in gallbladder regulation. Calcium–calmodulin activates MLCK, which phosphorylates the regulatory myosin light chain; the balance with MLCP shapes contraction. Neural pathways including NO–sGC–cGMP and VIP–cAMP may contribute to outlet relaxation. Sphincter resistance need not become zero, and physiological coordination does not ensure safe drainage through a stone or stricture. Greater duodenal bile does not verify every link in this proposed herbal mechanism.

## Sterol synthesis: interpreting enzyme claims

### HMGCR and AMPK

HMG-CoA reductase, HMGCR, converts HMG-CoA to mevalonate early in sterol synthesis. AMPK can reduce HMGCR activity by phosphorylation, including human Ser872. AMPK Thr172 concerns regulation of the kinase itself: these sites belong to different proteins.

Gebhardt (1998) proposed indirect HMGCR regulation in a cell model; cynarin was not the main active constituent. That study did not establish the particular LKB1/CaMKKβ–AMPK–Ser872 sequence. A plausible physiological pathway is not a demonstrated oral-extract mechanism, and “indirect” does not imply equivalence to a statin.

### CYP51A1: structure and inference

Squalene epoxidation and cyclization produce lanosterol. CYP51A1 is a microsomal heme-containing sterol-14α-demethylase supplied by the redox partner POR. Successive oxidation removes the 14α-methyl group; subsequent reactions produce further sterol intermediates. It is an obligatory step, but not the first enzyme after squalene or a universally unique rate-limiting step. Bloch and Kandutsch–Russell branches differ in the ordering of side-chain transformations.

PDB 3LD6 is human CYP51 bound to ketoconazole (Strushkevich et al., 2010), rather than luteolin or cynarin. Docking proposes a ligand position; inhibition requires enzyme kinetics, concentrations, and selectivity assessment. Complete CYP51 or squalene-synthase blockade by cynarin is unestablished. Neither should appear as a proven target of the extract.

[![Sterol physiology and levels of evidence for artichoke; 3LD6 contains ketoconazole, not cynarin.](https://api.nutrifit.health/api/v2/public/knowledge/files/images/nutrifit-scientific-20261002-artichoke-extract-cynarin-choleretic-lipid-metabolism-evidence-en-v1.png)](https://api.nutrifit.health/api/v2/public/knowledge/files/images/nutrifit-scientific-20261002-artichoke-extract-cynarin-choleretic-lipid-metabolism-evidence-en-v1.png)

### CYP7A1, sterol export, and LDLR

CYP7A1 hydroxylates cholesterol in the classical bile-acid pathway:

$$
\mathrm{Cholesterol+NADPH+H^++O_2\rightarrow 7\alpha\!\!-hydroxycholesterol+NADP^++H_2O}.
$$

This describes enzyme function, not proven induction by artichoke. ABCG5/ABCG8 participate in sterol secretion, whereas ASBT participates in intestinal bile-acid reabsorption. Secretion into bile differs from removal from the body because most bile acids return through enterohepatic circulation. An “extract inulin” sequestration claim requires actual composition and fecal-balance evidence.

Low endoplasmic-reticulum sterol can release SCAP–SREBP-2 from INSIG retention. Golgi transport and S1P/S2P processing produce a nuclear factor regulating LDLR and cholesterol-synthesis enzymes. Total SREBP-2 suppression and activation therefore cannot be the same unified explanation. LDLR recognizes LDL through ApoB-100 and several remnants through ApoE; not every ApoB particle is an identical substrate. A clinical LDL-C decrease does not identify an LDLR mechanism.

## Endothelium, LDL oxidation, and cellular protection

Artichoke flavonoids were studied for effects on eNOS expression in endothelial cultures (Li et al., 2004). Protein abundance and phosphorylation are different regulatory levels. Specific Ser1177, Thr495, or Sp1/GATA changes require corresponding measurements. A vascular surrogate improvement also does not establish fewer myocardial infarctions.

Luteolin-rich extract was investigated in isolated-LDL oxidation models (Brown and Rice-Evans, 1998). Delayed laboratory oxidation does not prove human CD36/SR-A1 blockade. Saying that only oxidized LDL is atherogenic is incorrect: retention of ApoB lipoproteins in the arterial wall itself matters. Antioxidant chemistry does not remove the need to assess LDL concentration and cumulative exposure.

Nrf2–Keap1–ARE regulates adaptation to electrophilic and oxidative stress. Nrf2 stabilization, small-Maf interactions, and transcription can change glutathione synthesis and defense enzymes. SOD converts superoxide to H₂O₂ and is not a glutathione-cycle enzyme. GPX uses reduced glutathione to reduce peroxides; HO-1 cleaves heme, producing biliverdin, CO, and iron that requires safe handling. These reactions are developed in the articles on [GPX4 and lipid peroxides](/knowledge/glutathione-peroxidase-gpx4-ferroptosis-lipids) and [mitochondrial SOD2](/knowledge/superoxide-dismutase-sod2-manganese-mitochondria).

Toxic-injury experiments in isolated hepatocytes and animals (Adzet et al., 1987; Gebhardt and Fausel, 1997; Speroni et al., 2003) do not establish restoration across human liver diseases. General Nrf2 biology cannot justify specific Keap1-residue changes, universal GSH/GSSG >100:1, mPTP closure, or prevention of cell death in every patient.

## Clinical findings and limitations

| Area | What was examined | What remains uncertain |
|---|---|---|
| Lipids | Short trials of particular extracts and pooled results | Cardiovascular events, long-term safety, interchangeability |
| Duodenal bile | A small experiment with direct intestinal administration | Usual-capsule effect and particular transporter/motility contributions |
| Fatty liver | Transaminases and available imaging surrogates | Histological MASH remission, fibrosis, clinical outcomes |
| Dyspepsia | Symptom scales in a controlled trial | An obligatory biliary mechanism or universal indication |
| IBS | A subgroup analysis without adequate placebo control | Causal efficacy across IBS phenotypes |

Englisch et al. (2000) examined 1800 mg/day for six weeks in 143 adults. Within-group percentage change differs from the placebo-adjusted effect. Sahebkar et al. (2018) combined short trials: an estimate in mg/dL cannot become a guaranteed percentage at every baseline LDL-C. The Wider et al. (2013) Cochrane review does not establish prevention of cardiovascular events. Extract, dose, and population differences restrict inference.

Kirchhoff et al. (1994) administered 1.92 g directly into the duodenum in 20 participants with placebo comparison. This is not a usual oral regimen, and does not establish mandatory dosing 20–30 minutes before food.

Panahi et al. (2018) ran a two-month NAFLD pilot using 600 mg/day; Rangboo et al. (2016) assessed transaminases. Historical NAFLD/NASH labels cannot automatically become histologically confirmed MASH. ALT, AST, FLI, ultrasound, and biopsy are different measures. FLI combines anthropometric and laboratory parameters rather than directly measuring liver fat. Unverified exact numbers and the alleged “SteatoChoke-Study 2026” are not used as evidence.

Holtmann et al. (2003) recruited 247 people with dyspepsia, using 2×320 mg three times daily, totaling 1920 mg/day for six weeks, rather than 640 mg/day. Bundy et al. (2004) reported a subgroup analysis, not a placebo-controlled demonstration of IBS treatment. Symptom improvement does not prove elimination of biliary stasis; functional dyspepsia has multiple mechanisms.

## Pharmacokinetics and extract quality

Caffeoylquinic esters and flavonoid glycosides undergo hydrolysis and metabolism; microbiota also change the compound spectrum. Glucuronidation, sulfation, and methylation yield metabolites with different distribution and activity. The original luteolin concentration in a cellular assay therefore cannot be equated with plasma exposure after oral extract (Wittemer et al., 2005).

Without transport experiments, MCT1/MCT4, PEPT1, SGLT1, or OATP1B1/1B3 cannot be called universal routes for cynarin and all conjugates. PEPT1 mainly transports di- and tripeptides; its name is not evidence of polyphenol transport. Possible deconjugation and enterohepatic recycling do not guarantee continuous therapeutic levels or a single 6–12-hour half-life for the mixture.

Comparing products requires botanical species, organ, solvent, DER, native-extract mass, excipients, and analytical markers. DER is the starting-herb-to-extract mass ratio, not a clinical potency measure. Total caffeoylquinic acids expressed as a marker differ from pure cynarin content. “5%” without naming the measured fraction is insufficient.

A universal DER of 4–6:1 or mandatory 2.5–5% cynarin cannot be attributed to every pharmacopoeia. EMA discusses differing preparations, including aqueous forms and comminuted leaf; a blanket prohibition of tea is excessive. Analytical reproducibility matters, but does not establish efficacy by itself.

## Dose, combinations, and safety

Trial doses describe particular preparations and objectives. They do not form a universal 500–1800 mg/day protocol; the dyspepsia trial itself used a different regimen. Mandatory preventive timing, water volume, and enhanced efficacy of every combination are unestablished.

Red yeast rice contains pharmacologically active monacolins; statin intolerance does not make it automatically safe. Added CoQ10 does not guarantee removal of muscle symptoms or complete isoprenoid compensation. Phytosterol effects on intestinal absorption are more complex than universal direct NPC1L1 inhibition. Berberine/phospholipid combinations need their own evidence and interaction assessment. Suggested pathways cannot establish synergy; AMPK and LDLR/PCSK9 differences are discussed in [berberine and dihydroberberine](/knowledge/berberine-vs-dihydroberberine-ampk-pcsk9).

Self-treatment is inappropriate with bile-duct obstruction, cholangitis, or liver/biliary conditions requiring medical supervision; gallstones require clinical assessment. Artichoke/Asteraceae allergy matters. Possible adverse effects include diarrhea, abdominal cramps, nausea, heartburn, and allergic reactions. Small short trials cannot establish long-term safety. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, and pediatric data are limited; the preparation's instructions and medical context matter (EMA, 2018).

Pain, jaundice, fever, or impaired-drainage signs require diagnosis rather than a higher choleretic dose. Ultrasound and laboratory monitoring depend on circumstances, not a universal stone-size cutoff or testing interval. Dyslipidemia assessment includes overall cardiovascular risk and achieved lipids; liver assessment includes cause and severity.

## Method and interpretation

This narrative scientific article follows the original thematic structure with targeted checking of disputed mechanisms and clinical details on 8 October 2026. Available primary publications, abstracts, the PDB record, and regulatory material were used; some publisher and EMA pages were inaccessible, recorded in the working log. No systematic search, independent GRADE assessment, or external peer review was undertaken.

Artichoke remains a research subject with complex chemistry and some clinical signals. An actionable interpretation identifies the preparation, objective, and evidence level. Cynarin as a marker, possible bile effects, and experimental sterol regulation do not justify promising MASH treatment, stone elimination, or replacement of therapy with established clinical outcomes.

## FAQ

### Does cynarin explain all extract effects?

No. It marks a mixture whose luteolin, glycosides, and other constituents differ in activity and metabolism.

### Does artichoke demonstrably block CYP51A1?

This is unestablished. 3LD6 is a ketoconazole complex; docking cannot replace enzyme kinetics and clinical data.

### Are choleresis and cholekinesis identical?

No. The former is bile production; the latter is gallbladder emptying coordinated with outlet resistance.

### Is there one universal dose?

No. Trial doses refer to particular extracts and objectives, rather than one protocol for everyone.

### Can it be used with gallstones?

Stones and biliary disease require clinical assessment; stimulating bile does not remove mechanical obstruction.

## Sources

- [Sahebkar A, Pirro M, Banach M, Mikhailidis DP, Atkin SL, Cicero AFG. Lipid-lowering activity of artichoke extracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2018, 58(15):2549–2556.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28548897/)
- [Wider B, Pittler MH, Thompson-Coon J, Ernst E. Artichoke leaf extract for treating hypercholesterolaemia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013, (3):CD003335.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23543518/)
- [Englisch W, Beckers C, Unkauf M, Ruepp M, Zinserling V. Efficacy of Artichoke dry extract in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia. Arzneimittelforschung, 2000, 50(3):260–265.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10758778/)
- [Kirchhoff R, Beckers C, Kirchhoff GM, Trinczek-Gärtner H, Petrowicz O, Reimann HJ. Increase in choleresis by means of artichoke extract. Phytomedicine, 1994, 1(2):107–115.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23195882/)
- [Panahi Y, Kianpour P, Mohtashami R, Atkin SL, Butler AE, Jafari R. Efficacy of artichoke leaf extract in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial. Phytotherapy Research, 2018, 32(7):1382–1387.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29520889/)
- [Rangboo V, Noroozi M, Zavoshy R, Rezadoost SA, Mohammadpoorasl A. The effect of artichoke leaf extract on alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase in the patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. International Journal of Hepatology, 2016, 2016:4030476.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27293900/)
- [Holtmann G, Adam B, Haag S, Collet W, Grünewald E, Windeck T. Efficacy of artichoke leaf extract in the treatment of patients with functional dyspepsia: a six-week placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre trial. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2003, 18(11-12):1099–1105.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14659029/)
- [Bundy R et al. Artichoke leaf extract reduces symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome and improves quality of life in otherwise healthy volunteers suffering from concomitant dyspepsia: a subset analysis. J Altern Complement Med. 2004;10(4):667–669. doi:10.1089/acm.2004.10.667.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15353023/)
- [Gebhardt R. Inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis in primary cultured rat hepatocytes by artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) extracts. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 1998, 286(3):1122–1128.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9732368/)
- [Gebhardt R. Inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis in HepG2 cells by artichoke extracts is reinforced by glucosidase pre-treatment. Phytother Res. 2002;16:368–372.](https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.960)
- [Li H, Xia N, Brausch I, Yao Y, Förstermann U. Flavonoids from artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) up-regulate endothelial-type nitric-oxide synthase gene expression in human endothelial cells. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2004, 310(3):926–932.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15152028/)
- [Brown JE, Rice-Evans CA. Luteolin-rich artichoke extract protects low density lipoprotein from oxidation in vitro. Free Radical Research, 1998, 29(3):247–255.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9802556/)
- [Strushkevich N, Usanov SA, Park HW. Structural basis of human CYP51 inhibition by antifungal azoles. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2010, 397(4):1067–1078.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20149798/)
- [Speroni E, Cervellati R, Govoni P, Guizzardi S, Renzulli C, Guerra MC. Efficacy of different Cynara scolymus preparations on liver complaints. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2003, 86(2-3):203–211.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12738088/)
- [Gebhardt R, Fausel M. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects of artichoke extracts and constituents in cultured rat hepatocytes. Toxicology in Vitro, 1997, 11(5):669–672.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20654366/)
- [Adzet T, Camarasa J, Laguna JC. Hepatoprotective activity of polyphenolic compounds from Cynara scolymus against CCl4 toxicity in isolated rat hepatocytes. Journal of Natural Products, 1987, 50(4):612–617.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3430163/)
- [Chen MC, Wu SV, Reeve JR Jr, Rozengurt E. Bitter stimuli induce Ca2+ signaling and CCK release in enteroendocrine STC-1 cells: role of L-type voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, 2006, 291(4):C726–C739.](https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00003.2006)
- [Trauner M, Boyer JL. Bile salt transporters: molecular characterization, function, and regulation. Physiological Reviews, 2003, 83(2):633–671.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12663868/)
- [Medina JF. Role of the anion exchanger 2 (AE2, SLC4A2) in biliary bicarbonate secretion and chronic cholestatic liver diseases. Frontiers in Physiology, 2011, 2:103.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22194723/)
- [Makishima M, Okamoto AY, Repa JJ, et al. Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids. Science, 1999, 284(5418):1362–1365.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10334992/)
- [Chiang JY. Bile acid metabolism and signaling. Comprehensive Physiology, 2013, 3(3):1191–1212.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23897684/)
- [Wank SA. Cholecystokinin receptors. American Journal of Physiology, 1995, 269(5 Pt 1):G628–G646.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7491953/)
- [Mawe GM. Gallbladder neurobiology. Comprehensive Physiology, 2011, 1(3):1429–1442.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23737213/)
- [Carling D, Clarke PR, Zammit VA, Hardie DG. Purification and characterization of the AMP-activated protein kinase. European Journal of Biochemistry, 1989, 186(1-2):129–136.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2598929/)
- [Lattanzio V, Kroon PA, Linsalata V, Cardinali A. Globe artichoke: A functional food and source of nutraceutical ingredients. Journal of Functional Foods, 2009, 1(2):131–144.](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2009.01.002)
- [European Medicines Agency (EMA). European Union herbal monograph on Cynara cardunculus L. (syn. Cynara scolymus L.), folium. EMA/HMPC/197939/2017. Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC), 2018.](https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/herbal/cynarae-folium)
- [RCSB PDB 3LD6. Crystal structure of human lanosterol 14alpha-demethylase (CYP51) in complex with ketoconazole.](https://www.rcsb.org/structure/3LD6)
- [Wittemer SM et al. Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of caffeoylquinic acids and flavonoids after oral administration of Artichoke leaf extracts in humans. Phytomedicine. 2005;12:28–38.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15693705/)